Wisconsin Policy Research Institute columnist Mike Nichols observes something missed by most readers of Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged:

John Galt was a Wisconsinite.

Rand’s Galt was born in Ohio, but didn’t stay there long. He became a young engineer in an auto factory in Wisconsin before it, predictably, went out of business. He was an individualist and inventor who, stifled by the collectivism embraced by all the Wisconsinites around him, had to flee our state for a greener pasture – or, actually, valley.

Sound kind of familiar?

The first thought when I read this was that Galt must have worked for our late American Motors Corp. (Probably not Kissel, or FWD Corp.)

Actually …

Rand’s great “Twentieth Century Motor Company” is set in fictional Starnesville, Wisconsin — which so far as I can figure is a little northwest of Stevens Point. When Dagny Taggart and Hank Rearden (operating vice president of Taggart Transcontinental and founder of Rearden Steel, respectively) come upon it, it is nothing but an abandoned, dilapidated, cavernous shell of a factory that contains only one thing of value — the partial remnants of a motor that, they realize, looks capable of transforming static electricity into power.

Much later, Dagny finds why its inventor — and her future lover — abandoned it and the factory both. Galt left after his co-workers voted in favor of a new plan in which all employee earnings belonged to “the family” and compensation was based only on the degree of “need.”

Production and profits immediately fell and, soon enough, workers had been transformed into virtual panhandlers. The whole place ended up going bankrupt.

I wonder if the residents of Junction City realize their community plays a role in one of the most debated-upon and inspirational-to-conservatives-and-libertarians works of the 20th century.

Why Wisconsin? An archivist at the Ayn Rand Institute theorized a combination of Wisconsin’s “history of embracing Germanic social welfare policies” and our history as a manufacturing center.

Rand died in 1982. So the investigation could no longer include an interview, or questions about her thoughts on recent news of automobile plant closings caused in part by unsustainable union contracts, by the lagging per capita income in this state, by the startling recent news that Wisconsin now has more government jobs than manufacturing positions, by the ongoing “brain drain” of good minds to other places, or by the fascinating advances in nanotechnology around here that could lead to lighter stronger metals, but also by our state’s general deficiency of entrepreneurs.

Rand, you have to guess, would say she made Wisconsin a focal point of her book for a simple reason. It’s not a place where business generally thrives. …

Who was John Galt?

It’s worth remembering that he was — till he was driven away — one of us.

Trackback address for this post

Trackback URL (right click and copy shortcut/link location)

2 comments

Comment from: A.G. [Visitor]
I find Mike Nichols' running down of Wisconsin bizarre. Do you really support this? We have an amazing history of innovation and entrepreneurialism. Do I really need to make a list of things that started here or flourished here? Would you really prefer to live in Alabama? Sadly manufacturing is on the decline, but we are currently the leading manufacturing state in the United States. The reasons for that decline are largely much more macro than policy coming out of Madison, and have absolutely nothing to do with Victor Berger. It's sad to me that you & Mr. Nichols seem ideologically blinded to what's good about Wisconsin.
02/05/10 @ 08:56
Comment from: JD [Visitor]
I would prefer to live in Alabama if I was an auto-worker from Janesville! While I would no longer be making the
outrageous $30-40 per hour I had been extracting from GM in Janesville(plus CADILLAC benefits that the private sector can only DREAM of), I would be making a fair 'living-wage' that puts me in the middle of the middle class. I'd be putting pieces of an easy puzzle together for a wage that a relatively uneducated person should be happy to make in this modern world. Harsh? Perhaps. The real world as we better start to know it--absolutely.

The reasons are indeed 'macro'--a nationwide need to hold on to a time from the 50's-60's where we were the only game in town, and could afford the union's game of wage blackmail for labor peace. And, a democrat party that places its own advancement ahead of the good of the country--for instance: Davis-Bacon. Absolutely no reason in this day and age to charge the taxpayers 20% more for every building project they undertake--except to reward the corrupt union bosses for their campaign money.

Big business can be bad-unions are worse.
02/08/10 @ 20:01

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

Your URL will be displayed.
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Name, email & website)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will not be revealed.)